Thursday, April 29, 2021

Fatima: Based On The True Story

 

                    "Pray the Rosary everyday to obtain world peace." Our Lady of Fatima


The movie, Fatima: Based on a True Story was directed by Marco Pontecorvo and released to the public on April 24th, 2020. Although artistic license was taken, this movie is well-done: the cast, the acting, the costumes, etc. 

As far as recording the historical events accurately, this movie does a remarkable job while trying to fit all the events that happened in two hours. The main highlights with minor sub-plots are included-including the mayor's doubt in the faith and his wife's belief in the children, the brother of Lucia returning home from battle and the mother struggles with her own faith and what her daughter, Lucia, is revealing to her.  

The movie begins with the oldest child, Lucia (Stephanie Gil), hiding in a cave while she is visited by the Angel of Peace (Ivone Fernandes-Jesus), warning her of the war and showing her the pains and horrors that men inflict on each other, urgently asking Lucia to pray for peace.

This movie flashes forward to the to the future, where Lucia is now in a Carmelite convent and is being interviewed by a skeptic author (Harvey Keitel).  The skeptic asks her multiple questions, such as, "Why did God choose you, of all people?" To which the sister replied, "Because it was necessary." As the movie chronicles the lives of the young seers, and the disbelief of some of the people in the village, including Lucia's mother,(Lucia Moniz), the children demonstrate their faith with conviction that what they had seen and heard. The movie ends with the Miracle of the Sun, a quote from Albert Einstein(which seemed to be a little out of place), and pictures along with captions on what happened to Francesco and Jacinta, who died of the influenza epidemic and was later canonized by Pope Francis. Sister Lucia died when she was 97. 

I would recommend people watch the movie after they had done some research on Fatima first, just so they can notice some differences between the media and the history of Fatima. The book The True Story of Fatima by John De Marchi, I.M.C. would be an excellent source to start researching the miracle of Fatima and how the movie corresponds to the historical reality. 









































Book Review: With God in Russia by Walter J. Ciszek S.J.


    The memoir, With God in Russia, offers readers a vivid window into the social dynamic in Russia during the conclusion of the Second World War and the first decades of the Cold War. Relating firsthand experiences from this place and era, With God in Russia is not simply an autobiography containing dramatic historical themes. On the contrary, this book serves as a treasury of theological depth, revealing the Finger of God in seemingly broken situations. Written in 1964 A.D., With God in Russia was the first of two memoirs penned by the American-born Jesuit priest, Fr. Walter J. Ciszek S.J. (the second being his 1973 book, He Leadeth Me).  His remarkable story stands as an example of perseverance for the sake of the Gospel. After being declared Servant of God in the late twentieth century, "on March 21 [2006] the Congregation for the Causes of the Saints opened an official investigation into the life and virtues of Father Walter J. Ciszek, S.J."[1] With God in Russia recounts the years spent by Fr. Ciszek in the prisons of Soviet Russia and the Siberian labor camps, portraying them as “an ‘adventure’” and “heroic narrative of his resistance to a godless regime.”[2] Although it never strays from its initial focus on Fr. Ciszek’s experiences, With God in Russia incorporates the lives of several distinctive individuals, each of whom either parallel or contrast the attributes exhibited by the author. The reader is thus gifted with a glimpse of the inner structure of the human person, and each of the components forming man’s spiritual and psychological composition.

    In an effort to illustrate for his readers the intricacies of his story, in his book, With God in Russia, Fr. Ciszek paints a striking historical image. The events of his account occurred during the Second World War (1939-1945) and the Cold War (1947-1991), a time of extreme worldwide social unrest, particularly in the Soviet Union. At this time, the powers of Communism battled the Church with continuous brutality, and “Catholics throughout the Soviet Union saw their churches desecrated, seminaries and Catholic schools closed, and the practice of the faith generally driven underground.”[3] As a result of their religious beliefs, countless priests, nuns, and faithful laity disappeared into the prisons and work camps of Communist Russia. Nevertheless, the ever-present danger of arrest did not deter numerous courageous individuals from the mission of evangelization. Fr. Ciszek, the author of With God in Russia, offers one such example of heroism. Seeking to respond to the spiritual needs of the impoverished men and women adjusting to the War’s destruction of their homeland and to the Socialistic move toward collectivization of workers, Fr. Ciszek obtained permission from his superiors to enter the Russian workforce. Although he was well-aware of the possible consequences were the government to discover his religious motives, he did not hesitate to answer the call of Christ. In doing so, Fr. Ciszek highlighted the complete faith which alone sustained him, as evidenced by his words, “only in God would I put my trust.”[4]

    Fr. Walter Ciszek opens his book, With God in Russia, discussing the time spanning from his childhood to the early years of his priesthood. Although brief, this section builds for the reader a thorough appreciation of the author’s character. Rather than focusing solely on his positive attributes, Fr. Ciszek becomes vulnerable to his readers, deliberately and humbly sharing his flaws in temperament. As the book progresses, this previously acquired insight into Fr. Ciszek’s person leads to both understanding and admiration of the author. An excellent example of the connection between his personal attributes and the structure of his story can be found in his “Polish stubborn streak.”[5] Throughout the chapters of With God in Russia, it becomes evident that Fr. Ciszek harnesses this negative quality, transforming it for use in the service of Christ. It was this firm determination which led him to Russia. After his arrest under the false accusation of being a “Vatican spy,”[6] it was similar Christ-centered willpower which carried him through nearly a decade in the Russian Lubyanka prison and fifteen years in the Siberian GULAG. Moreover, it was his stubborn nature that led Fr. Ciszek to courageously persist in his priestly role regardless of the dangers and difficulties, ministering to countless troubled souls.

    Throughout With God and Russia, Fr. Ciszek never loses sight of the theological dimension of his story. Each element of his memoir pertains to two fundamental themes, namely, trust and Presence. As he daily experienced the evils of the Communist regime, the Soviet Prison camps became for him a school in spirituality. Over time, Fr. Ciszek came to comprehend that only in God would he obtain solace. One finds this expressed in his words, “for myself, I had no fear. I put all my trust and confidence in His divine will...I repeated over and over again: ‘Thy will be done.’"[7] This insight was paired with a profound recognition of God’s indwelling within his being. With his characteristic obstinacy, Fr. Ciszek refused to allow the surrounding darkness blind him to this Presence. This is not to imply that he was free of all internal darkness during his decades in Russia. Rather, it was by constantly redirecting his attention to the reality of the Divine’s innermost Presence, through unfailing dedication to his Jesuit prayer life, that Fr. Ciszek’s soul remained receptive to Christ.

    When pondering With God in Russia, readers find much practical advice for building a healthy relationship with God. Regardless of whether their circumstances are as extreme as Fr. Ciszek’s, the themes which he discussed remain relevant to each person. Just as the author of With God in Russia was fortified by his embrace of the Divine Will when faced with uncertainty, so too does trust in God’s all-encompassing Presence offer each man and woman constant consolation. I highly recommend reading With God in Russia as, through its detailed account of Fr. Ciszek’s encounter with God in painful surroundings, the book creates a roadmap to personal growth. In telling his own story of perseverance, Fr. Ciszek provides his readers with practical advice concerning their own life challenges. Although the author’s use of vocabulary is particular to the book’s Russian setting, With God in Russia is written in an uncomplicated style. Fr. Walter Ciszek’s book, With God in Russia, accomplishes the purpose for which it was penned, recounting “honestly and plainly”[8] the story of his time in Soviet prison, while ultimately illumining the indispensable Presence of the Divine Who, in the words of the author, "called me to, prepared me for, [and] then protected me during those years in Siberia.”[9]



[1] "Benedict XVI's Renouncement of the Papal Title 'Patriarch of the West,'" Catholic Historical Review 92, no. 3 (2006), 370.

[2] Gregory Freeze, Alexey Beglov, Nadezhda Beliakova, and Evgenia Tokareva, "Catholics in the Soviet Union: New Research and New Sources on Everyday Religious Life (1917-1958),” Catholic Historical Review 106, no. 3 (2020), 482.

[3] John Vidmar, The Catholic Church Through the Ages, A History, 2nd ed. (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 2014), 349.

[4] Walter J. Ciszek, With God in Russia (San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 1964), 124.

[5] Ciszek, With God in Russia, 24.

[6] Ciszek, With God in Russia, 184.

[7] Ciszek, With God in Russia, 354.

[8] Ciszek, With God in Russia, 17.

[9] Ciszek, With God in Russia, 17.


Image Credit: "With God in Russia," at www.amazon.com.

Book Details:
Publisher: HarperOne (June 13, 2017)
ISBN: 9780062641625
Pages: 400
List Price: 16:19 USD

Sacred Italian Masterpieces of the High Renaissance – Virtual Museum Exhibition

Introduction: Throughout the history of Christianity, the Church has shared an intimate relationship with sacred art. As early as the second century, the Faithful crafted sacred imagery, enriching their spiritual lives with art representing Christ and the Virgin Mary.[1] Just as over the centuries the Catholic Church has moved through various stages, so too has the tradition of sacred art conformed to the developments of each era. By embracing the innovations of the time and implementing their own artistic vision, the masters who decorated the churches and Christian homes that arose during their individual periods continue to gift culture with their genius. This virtual museum exhibition will analyze the religious imagery that appeared during the Italian High Renaissance, looking specifically to the work of three renowned artists:  Leonardo da Vinci (1452 A.D. - 1519 A.D.), Michelangelo Buonarroti (1475 A.D. - 1564 A.D.), and Raffaello Sanzio (1483 A.D. - 1520 A.D.). Whereas it is not possible to consider every one of these masters’ works, this exhibit will examine one specific sacred piece completed by da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael, in which each artists’ impact is well illustrated. In doing so, it will offer both a theological and historical perspective, discussing the relationship between the work of these artists and the Church of the Italian Renaissance.

An Overview of the Church in the Renaissance: In order to fully appreciate the inception of sacred art in the High Renaissance style, it is necessary to first understand the social and ecclesiastic dynamic of this period. Its title meaning rebirth,” the Renaissance period (fourteenth to seventeenth century) saw a tremendous shift in the cultural focus of Europe.[2] Humanism directed the social mindset, and intellectuals and artists alike sought to revive the traditions of ancient Greece and Rome. While during this period the Catholic Church was the primary spiritual influence as well as a leading social force, throughout much of the Renaissance She battled the destructive elements of the Protestant Reformation. In a quest to define Catholic belief, the Council of Trent was convened from 1545 A.D. to 1563 A.D. It was here that the council fathers reemphasized the need for religious art. Sacred imagery “was to have a pedagogical purpose by representing sacred doctrine and the Church’s aesthetic imprimatur was a necessary guarantee of doctrinal correctness.”[3] Although their work proceeded the council, the High Renaissance masters, Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo Buonarroti, and Raffaello Sanzio answered to this need. Beginning in c. 1490 A.D., the High Renaissance remained dominant in Europe for over three decades, not coming to an end until 1527 A.D. These years were of key importance within the entirety of the Renaissance and represent the heights of achievement acquired during the period.  As this exhibit will display, a style emerged which would positively enhance the teachings of Catholicism for centuries to follow.
 

1. Leonardo da Vinci

    It is appropriate that this museum exhibit open with Leonardo da Vinci, as he has long been considered the ultimate Renaissance man and “master of a hundred arts.”[4] Born on April 15, 1452 A.D., in Vinci, Italy, during his early years the young Leonardo was influenced by Humanism and its bond with Classical Antiquity. At the age of fifteen he was apprenticed in the workshop of Andrea del Verrocchio in Florence, under whom he showed remarkable talent.[5] Throughout the decades of his career, da Vinci worked under patrons in Florence, Milan, Rome, and France.[6] Rather than concentrating solely on the artistic dimension of his talent, he embraced the persona of the Renaissance man and took great strides in the realms of botany, geology, geography, military engineering, anatomy, and aspects of physical science, for instance, hydraulics and mechanics.[7] While each of these areas of study aided da Vinci in his artistic endeavors, his love of anatomy and engineering were of particular significance. Much of his work was highly influenced by Catholicism, such as seen in his church designs and religious art. However, due to the diversity of his interests, da Vinci finished few pieces, leaving his legacy in sketches and cartoons rather than completed works. Nevertheless, his significance is not mitigated. On the contrary, his work acted as a steppingstone to that of his contemporaries, the High Renaissance artists, Michelangelo and Raphael.

The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne and Saint John the Baptist

Leonardo da Vinci possessed a remarkable understanding of the sacred power of art, a concept beautifully conveyed in his words: "A good painter has two chief objects to paint – man and the intention of his soul.”[8] His cartoon for the Madonna and Child with Saint Anne and the Infant Saint John (c. 1505 A.D. – 1507 A.D.)  is particularly indicative of this philosophy. The graceful gestures in the drawing’s figures, together with their serene facial expressions, create a reflection of their deeper spirituality. In addition, this sketch demonstrates the bond existing between classical themed realism and religion so prominent within art of the High Renaissance. Incorporated into each figure is detailed naturalism, calling to mind da Vinci's extensive knowledge of human anatomy. This work thus demonstrates the incorporation of Humanistic thought which structured sacred art of the era, creating a balance among Renaissance aestheticism and the Church's mission of evangelization.

 

2. Michelangelo Buonarrota

    The second High Renaissance artist to be examined in this museum exhibit is indispensable to the artistic tradition of the Vatican. Michelangelo Buonarrota was born in Caprese, Italy, on March 6, 1475 A.D. At a young age he was placed in the care of a family of stone cutters, an event which “[laid] the foundation for his later love affair with marble."[9] Rather than thriving in academic studies, Michelangelo spent his time mesmerized by the work of nearby church painters, drawing what he experienced. At a young age Michelangelo began studying and working in the palace of Lorenzo the Magnificent, demonstrating unparalleled talent in the art of classical sculpture. Michelangelo’s love of this medium is particularly visible in his frescos, where he merged the intricacies of these two distinctive art forms, thus embodying his words: "I now believe that painting and sculpture are one and the same."[10] Michelangelo completed extensive work within the Vatican, illumining Church Doctrine with plaster, paint, and marble. Until his death in 1564 A.D., Michelangelo created masterpieces reflecting the Council of Trent's future stipulations concerning sacred art, building upon the foundation laid by Leonardo da Vinci while simultaneously influencing numerus other High Renaissance and post-Renaissance artists.

     The Last Judgement
When the artistic legacy of Michelangelo is considered, the frescos with which he adorned the Vatican's Sistine Chapel ceiling instantly come to mind. However, this museum exhibit will not focus on the ceiling set of frescos but rather, The Last Judgment (1534 A.D. - 1541 A.D), a painting he placed on the wall of the same chapel years later. Through its intense emotion and movement, this painting draws together both the humanistic and spiritual ideologies of the High Renaissance. For example, although the naturalistic Christ figure dramatically lifts is arm in anger, he also gracefully gestures toward his pierced side, representing both God’s mercy and justice. The incorporation of both realistic and imaginative figures serve to fully illustrate the theological theme of the Last Judgment scene. In this fresco, the prevailing Church mindset later conveyed in the Council of Trent is visible, wherein “most Catholics turned away from a ‘religion of the suffering God’ to a ‘religion of glory.’”[11] The human forms, taking the appearance of sculpted paintings, emulate the Humanistic Philosophy of the era with their emphasis on the perfection of man. Classical Antiquity, High Renaissance thought, and Catholic Doctrine ultimately merge, breathing new life into sacred art through Michelangelo’s talent.
 

3. Raffaello Sanzio

    The third and final High Renaissance artist to be discussed in this museum exhibit is Raffaello Sanzio. Known in popular culture as Raphael, this master was born in Urbino, Italy, in the year 1483. Raised in material, intellectual, and artistic wealth, Raphael quickly built a successful career. Beginning his artistic endeavors in Perugia, moving to Florence, and later working under papal patronage in Rome, he incorporated into his paintings stylistic themes prominent both in the work of Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo.  His efforts within the sphere of sacred art built upon that of these two High Renaissance artists and, like them, he continued to wed extreme emphasis on the humanity of his figures with their spiritual identity. In doing so, he also responded to the Church's desire to offer Her Faithful art with which they would personally connect. Although Raphael died prematurely at the age of thirty-seven (1520 A.D.), he completed numerous sacred works of undeniable significance, many within the heart of the Vatican.

      The Sistine Madonna

Completed in 1512 A.D. for use as an altarpiece in the convent chapel at San Sixtus in Piacenza, a sacred structure housing the relics of Saint Sixtus and Saint Barbara, this oil painting reflects the presence of these two saints as, at the sides of the Blessed Mother, both appear.[12] While Raphael painted the movement of the figure’s bodies in a remarkably realistic manner, the celestial background surrounding them offers a spiritual dynamic. The figures of the Virgin and Child wear pained expressions, as the intended location for the image was directly facing a crucifix. The majesty of the work is interwoven with tragedy, where each figure in the painting is aware of the future suffering awaiting the Infant. The Sistine Madonna thus embodies Raphael’s approach to sacred art, emphasizing the "symbolic power of [his] canvas,"[13] through which he embraced both Catholic spirituality and humanistic naturalism.


Conclusion: In analyzing the life and work of Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael, it becomes evident that they played a priceless role within the history of Catholicism. At a time when the Church was in need of sacred imagery to illustrate Doctrine, these three Italian High Renaissance artists created timeless religious masterpieces. The strides they took within the tradition of sacred art remain as relevant, if not more so, in the present day as they did during the High Renaissance. Just as da Vinci, Michelangelo, and Raphael grew from each other, so too have subsequent artistic styles emerged from these masters. This virtual museum exhibition ultimately offers a glimpse into a pivotal moment in the story of Church History, illumining its undeniable influence within the life of Catholicism.    



[1] Leonid Ouspensky, Theology of the Icon, Volume One, (Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir's Seminary Press, 1992), 74.

[2] Marvin Perry, Western Civilization: Ideas, Politics, and Society, vol. 1 (Boston, MA: Wadsworth Publishing, 2013), 293.

[3] Kevin V. Mulcahy, "The Cultural Policy of the Counter-Reformation: the case of St. Peter’s," International Journal of Cultural Policy 17, no. 2 (2011), 131.

[4] Thomas E. Woods, Jr. How the Catholic Church Built Western Civilization (Washington, DC: Regnery Publishing, 2005), 108.  

[5] "Da Vinci - The Renaissance Man. The Inventor. The Scientist. The Artist,"  in Museum of Science, at www.mos.org. 

[6] Carmen Bambach, "Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519)" (October 2002), in The Met, at www.metmuseum.org

[7] Fred S. Kleiner, Gardner's Art Through the Ages, Book D, Fourteenth Edition (Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning, 2013), 601.

[8] Kleiner, Gardner's Art Through the Ages, 601.

[9] "Michelangelo - Biography and Legacy," in The Art Story, at www.theartstory.org.

[10] Kleiner, Gardner's Art Through the Ages, 609.

[11] Damien Tricoire, "What Was the Catholic Reformation? Marian Piety and the Universalization of Divine Love," Catholic Historical Review 103, no. 1 (2017), 29.

[12] “The Sistine Madonna,” in Italian Renaissance Art, at www.italian-renaissance-art.com.

[13] Ivica Žižić, "'Stepping into the World' Martin Heidegger's remarks on the 'Sistine Madonna,'" Heythrop Journal 57, no. 5 (2016), 807.


Image References:

Image 1: Michelangelo Buonarrota, "The Creation of Adam," 1508 A.D. - 1512 A.D. Fresco, Sistine Chapel, Rome. www.hampshireculture.org.uk.

Image 2: Leonardo da Vinci, "The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne and Saint John the Baptist," c. 1505 A.D. – 1507 A.D. Charcoal heightened with black and white chalk on brown paper, National Gallery, London. www.leonardodavinci.net.

Image 3: Michelangelo Buonarrota, “The Last Judgment,” 1534 A.D. - 1541 A.D. Fresco, Sistine Chapel, Rome.

Image 4: Raffael Sanzio, “The Sistine Madonna,” 1513 A.D. – 1514 A.D. Oil on canvas. Gemäldegalerie Alte Meister, Dresden. www.italian-renaissance-art.com.


St. Teresa of Avila: The Book of Her Life


 “Believe me, in the presence of Infinite Wisdom, one act of humility is worth more than all the knowledge of the world.”

St. Teresa of Avila-Book of Her Life

St. Teresa of Avila was born on March 28th, the year 1515, two years before the Protestant Reformation began. She was the youngest of 12 children, and the most favored by her father. Her parents and brothers and sisters were all pious and devout. During her early life, she got caught up in the vanities of the world. “I began to make much of dress, to wish to please others by my appearance. I took pains with my hands and my hair, used perfumes, and all vanities within my reach.”[1] At the age of twenty, she desired to abandon her vanities and enter a Carmelite monastery, the monastery of the Incarnation. Through her many trials, tribulations, raptures, St. Teresa of Avila would become known as a writer, theologian, mystic and reformer of the Carmelite Order.

Among many of St. Teresa’s works is the Book of Her Life, or her Autobiography. The Book of Her Life was written in obedience to her spiritual director; it is informal and full of humility. The reader may get tired of the Saint’s numerous acts of humility, which she makes frequently throughout the work. Not only does she cover her life,  but in the course of her writings, she talks about the importance of perseverance in prayer, the role of a spiritual director, her own experiences with raptures and visions, and illustrates the four ways of praying according to Carmelite tradition: meditation, prayer of the quiet, repose, and union. The human side of the saint will become evident in how she often wanders about from subject to subject, though for good reason, as she herself would admit. “You, my father, must forgive me for wandering from the subject; and, as I am speaking to the purpose I have in view, you must not be surprised.”[2] This saint was a lover of truth and distrustful of herself; at the end of her book, she begs her spiritual director to destroy anything in her writings that may bear resemblance to error. The Book of Her Life is full of humility, wisdom (especially regarding the doctrine of prayer), and a sense of humor, which makes her approachable.



[1] Teresa of Avila, Book of Her Life, 3rd edition, trans. Fr. Benedict Zimmerman, O.C.D. 1921. Chapter II, 211

[2] Ibid, Chapter XIV, 253


Wednesday, April 28, 2021

 

St. Thomas More’s A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation was written around 1534 in a prison cell in the Tower of London. It was published by Richard Tottel, an English publisher, in 1553. A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation is one of three books More wrote while imprisoned, the others being, The Sadness of Christ and A Treatise on the Passion. The theme of his books reflect the position he was presently in. Dr. Jeff Mirus comments on More’s books as, "drawing from discussions he had in the Tower with his wife Alice and his daughter Margaret Roper, when they visited him in sore need of comfort fro his impending loss."1 More is incredibly composed as he writes A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation. He was trapped in tribulation while giving comfort to others in their tribulations.

More's situation, locked in the Tower of London while giving comfort to his wife and daughter, is the same theme as A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation. Vincent, a young man fearing the impending invasion of the Turks, goes to his Uncle Anthony for consultation. Words from More's wife and daughter must have inspired the words of the character Vincent, we read Vincent saying, "But us of your kindred shall you leave, a company of sorry comfortless orphans."2 Vincent seeks comfort in his uncle, though he knows that his uncle is in tribulation himself. Anthony is dying; a point Vincent highlights in the beginning of their dialogue. This very conversation that begins A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation could have taken place in the Tower of London. More knew he was going to die soon and so too his family. Vincent continues, "the greatest comfort a man can have is when he can see that he shall soon be gone. And we who are likely long to live here in wretchedness have need of some comforting counsel against tribulation to be given us by such as you, good uncle."3 More could see his end while he wrote A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation, but it did not bother him, and he remarks on this point many times throughout his book. Anthony reflects on the comfort of leaving this world for a heavenly home, a thought well within the mind of a condemned More.

A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation is an educational book, the story is More's advice. More uses analogy and parables through Anthony's answers. For example, Vincent fears torture under Turkish rule. Anthony paints a beautiful image of a man walking through the rain and asks Vincent, "Why wear a raincoat if you do not intend for it to get wet?" The raincoat acts as an analogy of the body and soul. Rain might soak the raincoat, but the clothes underneath will by dry. Anthony's analogy is applied to a deeper idea of theology. To sacrifice the body before the soul. Such images as this riddle A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation. They make a complex book easier to understand and remember, an important aspect for an educational book.

To read A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation one finds himself locked in dialogue with St. Thomas More. Vincent's questions are practical and, though asked five centuries ago, are no different from the concerns of our present day. Vincent's fears are so wide that readers of different backgrounds will be able to relate to them. Anthony's responses stem from a Catholic understanding of the world. However, his attention to virtue will entertain and comfort readers of different world and religious views.

St. Thomas More's A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation is an excellent book to read. It offers good advice for those in tribulation, and More's use of analogy and parable make topics easier to understand and remember. To read A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation one finds himself locked in dialogue with a saint.


1 Dr. Jeff Mirus, St. Thomas More's Razor Sharp Dialogue of Comfort, Jan 17, 2017.

2 St. Thomas More, A Dialogue of Comfort Against Tribulation, (Mineola, New York, Dover Thrift 2016), 1.

3 Ibid, 1.

The multiple views of Vatican II

 

Vatican II was and is a point of tension between Catholics. Some Catholics abuse its teaching and use it to justify poor religious practice. George Lindbeck wrote progressive Catholics “appealed to the Council to justify their own loss of faith, their mindless capitulation to modernitas, their devious and unacknowledged departures from what is essential, not only to the Roman tradition, but to Christianity itself.”1 On the other side conservative Catholics brushed Vatican II under the rug or blamed it for the evil rising in the Church. The issues Vatican II faced were ambiguity and that it, according to Maritain “had unleashed vast, pent-up longings both inside and outside the Church. Some of these were forces for great good, but in others lay the potential for great evil.2 However, while there were two sides of Vatican II, one far to the left and the other far to the right, there was a middle. The middle road was accepting Vatican II and thanking God for it. St. John Paul II would comment on Vatican II as a “sure compass in our time.” Though Vatican II has been abused and hated, it was called, it happened, and it was not only good but necessary.

We will first consider the bad that came out of Vatican II. How could so much bad come from a council that sought good? Alan Schreck gives an answer, “Many of the difficulties in the Catholic Church since Vatican II have nothing to do with the council but were problems created by the increasingly secular and godless culture of the world in which the Church lives.”3 Bruce Marshall comes to a similar conclusion, “the astonishing readiness of some Catholics, in the name of being up to date, to “kneel before the world.’”4 Marshall, however, makes a further observation; most theologians of the day were priests and religious. The shepherds were the first to abuse Vatican II, Maritain wrote of priests, “they who boast of no longer genuflecting before the tabernacle, but happily bend the knee to the manifold spirits of this passing world.”5 This would be the cause of concern of the Church and an issue with Vatican II. Vatican II would have its reputation sullied by priests permitting offences or by being permissive, letting their congregation think what they want to think. The many experiments to make the Mass more enjoyable for the laity caused a loss of faith, Schreck writes, “Related to this was a general loss of understanding of the Church as a mystery of God’s work and presence in the world. Some Catholics began to look at the Church as just another human organization.”6 This is not just the opinion of Schreck. Taking from a progressive, who implored Vatican II for ridding The Catholic Church of its salvific identity, we read, “The official Catholic position now is that one can fulfill the "meaning of life" extra ecclesiam, outside the Church.”7 While Vatican II did say this, the author of the statement is not considering the whole statement. He discusses the Decree of Ecumenism which also said, “the Catholic Church possesses the fullness of the means of grace and salvation brought to mankind by Jesus Christ.”8  This mentality was real and post Vatican II saw Catholics leaving the Church to join Protestant denominations that were more enthusiastic or easier to practice. The issues that Vatican II faced were over enthusiasm on bad interpretation. Schreck, Maritain, and Marshall wrote along the same lines, when Vatican II opened the window the Holy Spirit came in but, as often happens when windows are opened, unwanted things, evil things, crept in as well. 
          
  

        On the conservative side of things Vatican II was stripping away the Church’s only defense to a modernist world, anti-modernism. St. John XXIII believed that anti-modernism, the Church’s present response to modernism, was ineffective and even destructive for Catholics. Marshall writes about the opinion of Congar, a theologian of Vatican II, “this anti-modernist discipline had become ineffective at coping with the flood of social, cultural, and intellectual forces that confronted the Church.”9 The fear of St. John XXIII and several bishops and theologians was that modernism would overtake the Church. Defenses had to be put in place. St. John XXIII and the members of Vatican II knew that any actions taken would cause trouble. Marshall sums the decision of Vatican II as, “A true reckoning with modernity, the banal and the destructive as well as the good, meant deliberately steering the barque of Peter for a long sail on turbulent seas.”10 Conservatives criticized Vatican II for opening the window too quickly. They had suggested that the window should be open then shut, only a small breeze or glimpse of modernity was all that was needed.

           

While Vatican II produced problems many good things came from it. Despina Prassas, a theologian, came from an Orthodox background. Her opinion of Vatican II is that it was necessary and a fruitful council. One point from her essay on the legacy of Vatican II was that it allowed the Catholic Church to reach out to Orthodoxy and Protestantism in a way it could not before. The Decree of Ecumenism, which was abused by some, helped to bring unity between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church. In December of 1965, at the closing of Vatican II, there was a joint declaration between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church lifting the anathemas on each other. We can further read along the lines of Schreck, Marshall, Maritain, and Prassas, and see that the errors that came with Vatican II were already festering within the Church. The 1800 seen in churches or the mass evacuation of priests after Vatican II did not come from something Vatican II allowed but rather the opposite. Vatican II worked to establish the sanctity of marriage and the life of laity. What bad came from teachings on laity? Priests and religious, brothers and nuns, left their posts by the thousands to be a part of the lay sanctity. They disregarded the Decrees on Religious, which stressed the importance of those who take vows for the sake of God. Schreck writes, “Many priests and religious apparently did not understand all that Vatican II had to say about their spiritual identity and mission and their continued need to be guided by those in authority over them in the Church.”11 Here we can see the backlash as a necessary commentary on the Church. Vatican II saw that it was necessary to speak to the laity, to remind the laity that they are active members of the Church and called to holiness. Before Vatican II the laity were treated as second rate citizens and given little respect in the Church. Yet upon speaking to the lay, priests abandoned their churches or nuns left their convents. A point Schreck, Marshall, and Maritain make is that those who were willing to violate the decrees of Vatican II or all together leave the Church were likely to do so on their own regardless. Vatican II forced their hands. Marshall goes so far as to say that if Vatican II never happened there could have been a schism similar to the Protestant Reformation.

           

Vatican II saw a change in the Church. It seems that for every Decree there was some good and some bad. It was not the intention of Pope St. John XXIII and Pope St. Paul VI to cause trouble in the Church. They were two strong figures that steered the Church through some of the most difficult times. Further, the effects of Vatican II have only just begun to truly show. Fr. John Vidmar writes against the criticism of Vatican II causing a drastic decrease in vocations, “In the early twenty-first century, vocations are on the rise again and have proven wrong the sociologists’ predictions of the end of the priesthood and religious life.”12 Vatican II was a necessary step the Church had to take to enter the world and evangelize.


Marshall, Bruce, Reckoning with Modernity, First Things: A Monthly Journal of Religion & Public Life. Dec2015, Issue 258, p23-30.
2 Ibid
Alan Schreck, The Compact History of the Catholic Church, Rev. ed., (Cincinnati, OH: Franciscan Media, 2009), 149.
4 Marshal, Bruce, Reckoning with Modernity.
5 Ibid
6 Alan Schreck, The Compact History of the Catholic Church,151.
7 Swidler, Leonard, Vatican II: The Catholic Revolution from Damnation to Dialogue, Journal of Ecumenical Studies. Fall2015, Vol. 50 Issue 4, p511-524.
8 Alan Schreck, The Compact History of the Catholic Church,141.
9 Marshal, Bruce, Reckoning with Modernity.
10 Marshal, Bruce, Reckoning with Modernity.
11 Alan Schreck, The Compact History of the Catholic Church,150.
12 John Vidmar, OP The Catholic Church Through the Ages: A History; Second Edition,( New York / Mahwah NJ, Paulist Press, 2014)