Saturday, August 17, 2019

An Interview with St. John of the Cross on Living Flame of Love

My Conversation with a Mystic  
 By Sr. Cherubimaris Casino

Because of the complexity of St. John of the Cross’ writings, I thought it would be a great idea to speak with him personally and share this information with our Church History class. Providentially, he agreed to speak with me despite his busy schedule of constant intercessory prayer.

Sister (Me): On behalf of the Roman Catholic Church, I would like to thank you Padre St. John, for taking the time out of eternity to speak with me today about your book Living Flame of Love that has touched the hearts of millions for centuries!

St. John of the Cross: Thank you, Dear Sister. It is with great beatitude that I have come to share my spiritual journey. It is humbling to speak from Heaven. We are all “crumbs that have fallen from God’s table”[1] for we are an overflow of God’s bounty.  

Sister: Beautiful! I’m in fact overflowing with joy to hear what you have to say. Before we begin talking about your works, would you kindly share about your background?

St. John of the Cross: My father Gonzalo came from a wealthy family of cloth merchants. He fell in love with my mother Catalina, who was a weaver from a poor family. Due to the conventions of the time, my father was disinherited from his family after marrying my mother who was poor. He died when I was just a little boy, and the family was left impoverished. All these events as a child formed my heart for the priesthood that was to come.

Sister: Goodness. Those are certainly some hard beginnings for a child. Could you describe what was happening in the world at that time?

St. John of the Cross: I was born in the province of Avila during the Siglo de Oro, the Golden Age of Spain when the Spanish empire was expanding dynamically across the globe.[2] Christopher Columbus had just discovered America about fifty years earlier and the Spanish period of colonization began in 1492.
Sister: How exciting! How did this affect you and how was the Church affected?

St. John of the Cross: King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella tried to unite their kingdoms into a Christian kingdom, and sadly expelled or forced Spanish Jews to convert. But it was certainly a time of religious renewal and spiritual fervor.[3] There was an emphasis on returning to the spirit of the founders, contemplation, and poverty. As for my family, we remained poor as the country grew in wealth, since most of their money went to supporting wars. Yet in God’s providence, I was able to study at a school for orphans and poor children and had many holy mentors along the way.

Sister: Speaking of mentors, it’s no secret that you were good friends with St. Teresa of Avila and helped her greatly in the reformation of the Carmelite order, including the spread of mysticism in sixteenth century Europe. How would you say that your works compare to hers? Are they different at all or are you essentially saying the same thing?

St. John of the Cross: During the time that St. Teresa became prioress of the order, she received the gift of spiritual marriage, the highest level of union with God.[4] So she experienced the Dark Night and the Living Flame. In essence, the spirituality is the same but the terms are different. For example, I call the first stage of purgation “active night of the senses.” She calls it the “first and second mansions” of the interior castle. I call the second stage the “active night of the spirit,” while she proceeds with the “second and third mansions.” When we get to the beginning of the illuminative way, we come to the “passive night of the senses.” This is when God purifies the soul directly, and the transition between the third and fourth mansions.[5]

Sister: After reading Living Flame of Love, I’ve been inspired to reach the unitive way. Would you kindly give me some advice as to what I can do?

St. John of the Cross: (Laughs) Well, my beloved daughter, it’s not what you can do but what God can do in you. It is God who purifies and raises you to Himself. The question is, if you are receptive to His grace.

Sister: Ahh…I see.

St. John of the Cross: That is why the passive night is “passive,” for it is God who carries you at that point.

Sister: Wow! Is that why St. Therese of Lisieux described her way to Heaven as an elevator in Story of a Soul?

St. John of the Cross: Yes, St. Therese ascended to God the Father in the Carmelite spirituality, simply through her “Little Way.”

Sister: Would you briefly summarize The Ascent of Mt. Carmel for those who are not familiar with it?

St. John of the Cross: Mount Carmel is the place where the soul encounters God. It is where the great saints have learned their spirituality from Our Lady of Mt. Carmel, who is the school of love. In the ascent to perfection, a soul undergoes four divisions of purgation to be emptied of itself that it may be completely filled with God. The first two stages are the active night of the senses and the active night of the spirit, with more weight and effort placed on our part. The next two stages, the passive night of the senses and the passive night of the spirit are accomplished directly by God.[6]

Sister: In the first stanza, you address God as the “living flame of love” which burns in the soul’s deepest center. Is this presence of God already dwelling within, or must we go find it? How would you discuss this nature of union with God?

St. John of the Cross: “To understand the nature of this union, one should first know that God sustains every soul and dwells in it substantially, even though it may be that of the greatest sinner in the world. This union between God and creatures always exists.”[7]

Sister: How then would you describe the transformative union in one word?

St. John of the Cross: LOVE!


Sister: Amen! That makes so much sense. Now, I have a few questions about your poem Living Flame of Love. What does the image of the log and flame represent?

St. John of the Cross: The log is now completely transformed into the fire and shoots its flames out of intense love for God. This is the soul in transforming union, a perfect union of the soul with God.

Sister: Why do you think so very few souls reach this stage?

St. John of the Cross: They simply do not want it bad enough. Once those souls experience great tribulation and trial, they become frustrated or discouraged, and turn to their old ways. It is also out of fear. Often, people become afraid of surrendering everything to God because they are afraid that His Will entails a cross too heavy for them to carry.

Sister: How can we motivate people to become detached from self-will and self-love?

St. John of the Cross: They must know that “in the twilight of life, God will not judge us on our earthly possessions and human success, but rather on how much we have loved.”[8]

Sister: Love seems to be everything in all and for all. I’m very interested to know what the soul looks like in divine union. You describe it as a single “living flame of love.”

St. John of the Cross: The soul feels completely inflamed in the divine union, “its palate is all bathed in glory and love, flooded with no less than rivers of glory, abounding in delights, and from its depths flow rivers of living water.”[9]

Sister: It sounds like this soul is swimming in the heights of heaven! Does the soul consciously know that it is in such a state?

St. John of the Cross: The state of the soul is hidden to the person, but at that point, there is no longer self to the self, but God.

Sister: In the same stanza, you mention that acts of love are more precious and meritorious than “all the deeds a person may have performed in the whole of life without this transformation, however great they may have been.”[10] Does this mean that one act from a transformed soul is much greater than several acts one by many good souls?

St. John of the Cross: Yes! For this reason, the Blessed Virgin Mary simply cooking a meal for the Child Jesus was worth more than all the acts of martyrdom in the Church.[11] Her love was perfect. In this state the soul does not make acts of its own because the Holy Spirit makes them all. All the acts of the soul are divine. It is like the difference between the wood on fire and the flame leaping from it since the flame is the effect of the fire.[12]

Sister: Wow! So what really matters is not even the magnitude of a work or the suffering, just the love?

St. John of the Cross: The greater the love, the greater the merits.

Sister: Hmm…Well then! That also explains how St. Therese of Lisieux obtained great spiritual heights in the small tasks and little struggles she had.

St. John of the Cross: Exactly.

Sister: Moving on to my next question: Why is it that you begin the third stanza with a different image, “lamps of fire?”

St. John of the Cross: Lamps are the attributes of God, for God is His attributes wrapped in knowledge and love. When the soul participates in the light and heat of God’s attributes, the experience is so intense and delight, all as one movement.[13]

Sister: That just gives me Goosebumps. That also reminds me of my favorite line in the fourth stanza: “How gently and lovingly You wake my heart.”[14] What is the heart being awakened to? Is it the presence of God within it?

St. John of the Cross: Yes, this is the first effect of union – the awakening. God was always there, hidden in the substance of the soul. Now the soul awakens to His presence.

Sister: But does not the soul already know this intellectually? What is the difference of knowing God’s presence now in the unitive state?

St. John of the Cross: The difference is that now, the soul knows creatures in God. There is knowledge of God ‘a priori’ instead of ‘a posteriori.’[15] That is, instead of knowing God in creatures, the soul knows creatures in God because God is the cause, and by knowing the cause, the soul knows the effects.

Sister: It seems that the whole person is transformed, including the eyes through which it sees.

St. John of the Cross: Yes, for the soul is transformed by the object of its love.

Sister: Oh no! It looks like we’re out of time!

St. John of the Cross: Contact me anytime, Sister. I have eternity!

Sister: Thank you again, Father St. John, for your spiritual wisdom and instrumentality in transforming the Church! After all that I’ve read and heard, I can’t wait to go to the chapel to be with my Love!





[1] John of the Cross, trans. David Lewis, The Ascent of Mount Carmel (London: Thomas Baker, 1906), Book I, Chapter VI, at https://www.archive.org.
[2] Federico Ruiz, O.C.D., et al., God Speaks in the Night: The Life, Times, and Teaching of St. John of the Cross (Washington D.C.: ICS Publications, 1991), 12.
[3] Mark O'Keefe, Love Awakened by Love, (Washington DC: ICS Publications, 2014), 15.
[4] O'Keefe, Love Awakened by Love, 19.
[5] Thomas Nelson, lecture on Christian Asceticism, (Front Royal, VA: Christendom College), recorded 20 July 2019.
[6] Nelson, lecture (20 July 2019).
[7] John of the Cross, The Ascent of Mount Carmel, Book II, Chapter V.
[8] Lawrence Cunningham, “Who was St. John of the Cross?” at America: the Jesuit Review, at https://americamagazine.org.
[9] John of the Cross, trans. Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez, Living Flame of Love, (Washington DC: ICS Publications, 2010), Chapter 1, iBooks edition.
[10] John of the Cross, Living Flame of Love, Chapter 1.
[11] Nelson, lecture (20 July 2019).
[12] John of the Cross, Living Flame, Chapter 1.
[13] John of the Cross, Living Flame, Chapter 3.
[14] John of the Cross, Living Flame, Chapter 4.
[15] John of the Cross, Living Flame, Chapter 4.

Vatican II

Vatican II came to a shock to the whole world, especially when Pope John XXIII announced it. This was to bring unity within the Church and for the Church to be up to date.[1] Many bishops were against this because they saw just as something that was going to repeat itself. The call for Vatican II was done at good timing because the world was at the brink of technological achievements. Pope John wanted to let in fresh air into the Church, so in a way, he opened them for everyone. Pope John also wanted a new revival within the Church, such as a new Pentecost. [2] Sadly pope John XXIII would pass away in 1963 after the first session. 
 Pope Paul VI is then the new pope and continues the work of his predecessor Pope John XXIII. His job was now to "oversee the implementation of the council bringing it from documents on paper into the reality of the life of the Catholic Church".[3] Vatican II documents show how the Church wants to promote unity through active participation and calling for social justice. the first immediate change that was done after Vatican II was the mass. This would allow the laity to actively participate during mass. The church also brought the permanent deacons and the RCIA program. The relationship with other Christians was also a big thing for the Church to bring unity from our separated brothers and sisters. The Achievements of Vatican II was to establish a positive relationship with non-Christians and the modern world.[4] Many religious men and women got to renew their religious orders and the laity had this sense of responsibilities. After Vatican II there were movements that were set in motion which then were approved by Pope Paul VI in 1975.[5] One of these big movements was the Charismatic Renewal which was seen by the Church as the work of the Holy Spirit. 

`The problem with Vatican II was not her documents by the confusion it brought to both religious and laity. Many Catholics were worried especially pope John XXIII because he "opened the window" which means that he allowed the Holy Spirit to enter but also evil thing could have been blown into the Church also. [6] This confusion caused many priests and religious to leave because they misinterpreted the documents thinking that the Church wanted them to get involved in the world. Bishops also were confused and allowed many Catholics to do whatever they wanted. The Church also emphasized greatly in participation and sadly many people lost the sense of reverence in the presence of God.[7] Another major confusion was the misinterpretation of when the phrase was said about being in touch with the world or open to it. Many people thought that it meant to bring secular things into the Church.[8]



[1] Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 2009 130
[2]  Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church.132
[3]  Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church.133
[4]  Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 144
[5]  Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 147
[6] Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 149
[7] Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 150
[8]  Schreck, Alan. The Compact History of the Catholic Church. 151

John Henry Newman Interview After His Conversion

Exclusive Interview with John Henry Newman
May 1st1847

Interviewer: Good Morning Reverend Newman, or is it just Mr. Newman now? 

Newman: Well, I am currently in formation for the priesthood so I’m not a Reverend yet; but you can call me John or Henry.

Interviewer: Thank you John! First of all, I was wondering if you could tell me a little bit about yourself: for the readers that may not know you! 

Newman: Well, I was born on February 21, 1801 and I was brought up in the Anglican Tradition. From when I was very young, I had a strong appeal towards religion and would spend time reading and studying the Scriptures.[1]However, as it happens to many young men as they start to grow, I began to question the dogmatic and revealed doctrines of Christianity. I sought to live a life of virtue, the life of a gentleman, but without involving God. This all changed for me when I was fifteen years old and read “Force of Truth” by Thomas Scott. This book changed my life and was my first true encounter with the love of God. The words of Thomas Scott inspired a profound change in me and pushed me to put God in the center of my life. I went to Trinity college where I considered a secular career; however, I ended up choosing Church ministry. After my studies, I was elected a fellow of Oriel College. I also became an Anglican minister, and later, vicar of St Mary's, which is, of course, the church at Oxford University.

Interviewer: So, when did these doubts or concerns about the Anglican begin? 

Newman
For some time before 1839, I was heavily involved in the Oxford movement which seeks to return to the traditions of the early years of the Church and place a special emphasis on the Church Fathers. For members of the Movement, the Church of England was a middle way ( or Via Media as we called it) between Puritanism, which discarded ancient traditions, and Roman Catholicism, which corrupted them. The goal was to stay balanced in a time when the Church of England was moving more towards Puritanism. There was a serious concern among some of us in the hierarchy that Bishops were being appointed for political rather than religious orthodoxy. We believed that the Church had a Divine appointment independent of the state with rights, prerogatives, and powers of its own. [2]Supporting and defending this movement led me to a serious study of the early Church and the Fathers. As I was studying the struggle of the early Church with the Monophysites in 1939, I believe it was, I came to a shocking and disturbing realization. The thing is that it was difficult for me to make out how Monophysites were heretics, unless Protestants and Anglicans were heretics also. I truly felt in that moment, as an Anglican, like a Monophysite: going against the true Church of Christ. It was after this discovery that I began to truly examine what this meant for my life including what it meant for my ministry and work. It was a slow process and it all began with this.[3]

Interviewer: What appealed to you about the Catholic Church and how was the process of taking that decision to leave the Anglican Church? 

Newman: It was very surprising because I was raised up to believe that the Catholic Church was the Antichrist. However, as I continued my studies of the Church Fathers, I began to see a truth that could not be denied. The years between my discovery of this truth and my initiation in the Catholic Church were very difficult: full of tension and distress. At this point, that my sympathies had grown towards the religion of Rome I do not deny; that my reasons for shunning her communion had lessened or altered it would be difficult perhaps to prove. And I wished to go by reason, not by feeling. Even though I had given up upon the Church of England by 1841 and had held affections for Rome for two years at that point, I was afraid to give into my affections for Rome because there were not rooted in reason. [4]As more time passed, I began to reconcile reason with my feeling, yet one last obstacle prevailed: that of authority. I firmly believed in the authority of the Anglican Church. If the Church of England had misled me, how could I be so certain of the veracity of the authority of Rome? Furthermore, if I rejected the authority of the Church of England, was I relying on my own private judgment, just as the contemporary Liberals do? In the end, as I continued to study the apostles, I realized that there was true apostolic succession in the Catholic Church. There is nothing which the Church has defined or shall define but what an Apostle, if asked, would have been fully able to answer. In the end, it was the faithfulness of the Church to the apostles that convinced me that this path was the Truth. With conviction in my heart, I was received into the Roman Catholic Church on October 9, 1845. 

Interviewer: I think it is fair to say that people were shocked at your conversion and that it caused a commotion. How did those close to you react? 

Newman: I have to agree that people were shocked: both Anglicans and Catholics. I think that there are two reasons for this. The first is that I could be considered a prominent Anglican minister who had done a lot for the Church. The second is that this change required a lot of sacrifice. I have to “start over” you could say in the sense of my ministry and formation. And I did loose many friendships and had many struggles within my family. At the end however, for me Truth is the most important thing, and I sincerely believe that the Truth is found in the Roman Catholic Church. Furthermore, I believe that change is an essential part of formation and therefore, I don’t see this as a bad thing, but an opportunity to fortify myself in my resolve to follow the Truth. 

Interviewer: I understand that you have made your decision, and that you don’t see a way back to the Church of England. However, is there anything you would advise the Church of England? 

Newman: Well it is a very hard question. I mean I would of course advise them to return to full communion with the Roman Catholic Church: not for the sake of the Catholic Church, but for the sake of the Church of England. I pray for the day when this becomes a reality, although I understand the difficulty of this reconciliation. At the very least however, I would encourage the Church to return to the Tradition of the Apostles and Church Fathers. This was the goal of the Oxford movement and I think that it would be the first step towards reconciliation with the Catholic Church. 

Interviewer: What would you say to someone who is experiencing similar doubts and struggles in their faith as you faced? 

Newman: My advice would be to keep searching for the Truth and look for it in the Catholic Church. You will find it if you truly have an open heart! Living in the Truth will not only be rewarded by the promise of eternal life, but also by a higher life here on earth. It will be difficult and there will be many obstacles, but it is worth it. I myself have and continue to encounter many difficulties. In the face of this, persevere. You will find the peace and Truth that you are looking for. 

Interviewer: So, what are your plans for now and the future? You spoke about priesthood? 

Newman: Well with the grace of God I will be ordained a Catholic Priest for the Congregation of the Oratory of Saint Philip Neri at the end of the month. I will work as a priest in the Oratory at Maryvale. With the grace of God, I hope to help others find the Truth and experience the love of God through the Sacraments. 

Interviewer: Finally, what would you hope to accomplish by this change of Church and lifestyle? 

Newman: What I truly want to accomplish is what each one of us should want as their ultimate goal: to reach Eternal Life with Christ. I believe that the best way to reach this goal is through the path and guidance of the Catholic Church. 

Interviewer: Well John, thank you for taking the time to speak with me. I think that a lot of people are angry or confused about your decision and I think this will at least share your side of the story. I think that you made some honest and valid arguments. 

Newman: Well I would just like to say that I never did any of it trying to hurt anyone or confuse people. I just followed my heart and what I believe is the Truth. And please know that I will always pray for those whom I ministered to while I was a minister of the Church of England. 





Works Cited

Servants of the Pierced Hearts. 2004. PiercedHearts.August. Accessed August 2019. 
https://www.piercedhearts.org/theology_heart/life_saints/john_henry_newman.htm.

Newman, John Henry. Apologia Pro Vita Sua. London: Sheed & Ward, 1978.

McNamara, Pat. "Newman's Road to Rome." Catholic Education Resource Center. 2012. 
Accessed August 18, 2019. https://www.catholiceducation.org/en/faith-and-
character/faith-and-character/newman-s-road-to-rome.html.




[1]Servants 2004
[2]McNamara 2012
[3]Newman, 114. 
[4]Newman, 175