Throughout history, there are many instances in which it is
shown that there are times in which it is necessary for the Church to show that
she holds fast to her teachings, even when world views change. In 1968, Pope Paul VI did just that when he wrote
the encyclical Humanae Vitae. In it, the Pope addresses issues that married
couples face when it comes to child bearing in the modern world. He shows that the Church recognizes the many
ways that people and societies are changing their views on matters such as the
way women were being viewed at that point in time as opposed to the past. Also, he wrote about the many difficulties
that couples face when it comes to having children, including health and
economic problems. With all of this noted,
he still maintains the Church stands firm in her understanding of human sexuality.
In this
writing, the Holy Father expresses that the teaching on marriage is “founded on
natural law, illuminated and enriched by divine revelation” (Humanae Vitae, 4). The significance of this is while many in the
world, particularly in the US, believe that they are entitled to control their body
by any means that they wish, and that relationships can be defined according to
any inclination one may have, there remains truths that can never be
altered.
While considering
the nature of the human body, he writes that “responsible parenthood means the
knowledge and respect of their functions; human intellect discovers in the
power of giving life biological laws which are part of the human person”
(10). Today, it seems as though to take
away this “power of giving life” through artificial means is a way of “progressing”
or “evolving” the human race. However,
when one considers the functions of the body, it still produces the same results
when healthy and unaltered by unnatural devices. What does this say? It says that nature does not conform to the
opinions of people and so doesn’t natural law.
And if these do not change, it cannot be a right for someone to adjust
it to their opinions.
Pope Paul
VI also says that “man, growing used to the employment of anticonceptive
practices, may finally lose respect for the woman and…may come to the point of
considering her as a mere instrument of selfish enjoyment, and no longer as his
respected and beloved companion” (17). This
has been considered to be prophetic as it has been proven to be correct since standards
for morality have been lowered after the increase of birth control usage
increased.
He emphasizes
the “two meanings of the conjugal act:
the unitive…and the procreative” (12) and that “to use this divine gift
destroying…its meaning and its purpose is to contradict the nature both of man
and woman…and therefore it is to contradict …the plan of God and His will”
(13). In this, he is stressing where the
Church truly stands on the issue, regardless of pressures from the world to
change her position on it.
So, is
this a huge, dramatic event in the history of the Church? Not seemingly so, however, it is an inspiring
example of how she remains true to her teachings and is unwavering even in the
midst of the ever changing world.
Work Cited
Pope Paul VI, Encyclical
Letter, Humanae Vitae. 1968. Pauline Books & Media. Print.
No comments:
Post a Comment