Sunday, March 10, 2019

A Review of The Dialogue by St. Catherine of Siena

Giovanni Battista Tiepolo, "St. Catherine of Siena," ca. 1746, painting, at https://www.wikiart.org
     

      St. Catherine, a mystic and doctor of the Church, lived during the Avignon papacy when much corruption existed among the ministers of the Church. On account of her wisdom, she was called to assist the Holy Father in returning to Rome, and she saw much corruption in the process of fulfilling this calling. Her concern over the state of the Church is revealed within The Dialogue. This work is structured as a prayerful dialogue with the Father. In places, the Father directs hard words against ministers of the Church.¹ However, these words are also surrounded by admonishes to give proper respect to His ministers. A fuller understanding of the insight of this work needs to consider the work as a whole, with special focus on the content of the beginning of the dialogue. 
      Catherine begins by communicating a desire for the honor of God and the salvation of souls, a desire which grows when she is provided fuller recognition of the extent of corruption within the Church.² However, as she prays to the Father for herself and others, she grows in a self knowledge and begins to recognize how united the Church is, "with a great knowledge of herself, being ashamed of her own imperfection, appearing to herself to be the cause of all the evil that was happening throughout the world."³ She recognized that in her own sins, she was to blame. Having not assisted with prayers and harming through sin, she had performed an injustice to her neighbor and had a part in the corruption of the Church. 
     In this consideration, the Father directs the conversation further as He seeks to assist her soul in development. He explains that through Christ alone can full propitiation for sin be made. She is not, therefore, to trust in her own finite suffering, for it is not the act itself which supplies the effects. Rather, through the love by which she does the acts, she attains remission of the sin and its effects through Christ’s sacrifice; it is not the finite pain, but the infinite contrition which the Father accepts as united to Christ’s sacrifice. However, the soul should desire, out of love, to suffer. This charity by which she seeks to serve Him, of necessity, must include the virtue of humility by which love is fostered; a proper humility recognizes one's own true nature and that of the infinite God through whom that nature was received and without whom it could not exist. As the soul grows in this true charity, she grows in a desire to suffer in love of God. The greater the measure of love with which she does these acts, the more the act will please God. This love is further strengthened and developed through practice of acts of love and loving perseverance in times of trial. However, the love developing must not be for the suffering itself, but for the developing of virtue.⁴ 
     With this focus, discretion must discern the manner and extent of penance which is possible. However, the Father stresses, one cannot judge merit on the extent of penance, for merit does not consist in the penance itself. Rather, merit consists solely in the measure of the virtue of love, properly ordered by discretion, through which the act is performed. Through these virtues we ensure to perform our duties to God and neighbor and properly attributes to God the good developed from virtue. Developing these virtues with humility, the soul guards her development from the snares of sin.⁵
     It is with this context that the Father first brings in a lament on the state of the Church with special mention of His ministers. The members of the Church are become filthy in self-love, pride, and avarice; the ministers, granted the privilege to administer the holy sacraments, are not excepted from these sins and administer that which is sacred, in ignorance and ingratitude, with "filthy hands." The Father proceeds to explain that where more is given, the greater will be the punishment. However, He promises that His faithful servants' hunger for souls will accomplish much for their salvation if the faithful will endure much in love. However, in the suffering, He promises great blessing through Christ.⁶
     The Father expounds this promise; He presents Jesus as the bridge over the tempestuous waters which rose by Adam's sin. There are three steps of the bridge, symbolizing three stages of the soul. At Christ's feet, the first step of the bridge, the soul removes herself from earthly affection; seeking to purify herself of vice, she gazes into Christ's heart and recognizes His great love for her. Recognizing His selfless love, the soul climbs to the second step, uniting her heart with His, developing in love and virtue. The soul then proceeds to the third step, the mouth of Christ, where she attains peace and is no longer buffeted by the torrential waters. This bridge may be hard to travel, but, unlike travel in the waters under the bridge, traveling the bridge of virtue causes burdens to become light. The bridge's union between Heaven and earth is created through the Holy Spirit's direction of the development of Church doctrine. Through traveling this bridge, man once again can attain the blessings of eternal life.⁷
      After this explanatory metaphor, the Father and the soul converse about the suffering of sin and the blessings received through virtue. There are many graces received by virtue, and those who seek pleasure in sin are to be both pitied and loved. However, the Father does at times remove spiritual consolations from the soul pursuing virtue, that the soul may grow in self knowledge and in recognition of dependence on Him and thus attain greater perfection. The soul must not, therefore, seek to serve God only for the sake of spiritual consolation, but must persevere even when the consolation be temporarily removed. To persevere, the soul must humbly turn to Heaven’s assistance through prayer and reception of the Sacraments. Through this means the soul can seek God’s grace to grow in perfection through death to her own will and desiring only the will of the Father. It is from this context of the personal responsibility of the soul to grow in virtue and sacrificial charity through vigilance and prayer that the Father proceeds to acknowledge the soul’s concern about corruption in the Church and the world.⁸
     The Father first speaks on the dignity of the priests who administer the sacraments, stating that they deserve respect on account of His choice to use them to provide the sacred sacraments to the faithful, even if they dishonor their calling. He acknowledges the soul’s recognition of the sin of many ministers but explains that recognition of the dignity of the Sacraments should inspire the soul to better recognize the dignity of the minister and grieve for those who administer the sacraments in sin.⁹
     It is in this context that He speaks harshly of His ministers, stating that they “wallow in the mire of filth, or … inflated by pride, seek… great prelacies.”¹⁰ As such, He has already presented the soul with her own sinfulness and her obligation to charity. He has further assisted her in recognition of the blessings of virtue and the pitiful state of those in sin and calls her to fuller perfection. He further presents to her the innate dignity of the priesthood and the respect due to the priests.
     Therefore, the Father’s statements become an acknowledgement of the objective immorality of the ministers. The soul, speaking to Him in prayer, is distressed about this immorality, and the Father is inflaming in her heart charitable pity for these souls and a desire for their conversion which becomes all the more intense on account of their dignified calling. The Father is not disgracing the minister or treating them with improper dignity; He called them to the dignity of their office and it is they who dishonored this sacred calling. Rather, He is calling the soul to union with Him through charity and to a recognition of the dignity of the priesthood and her obligation to pray for priests: “You should love them … by reason of the virtue and dignity of the Sacrament, and by reason of that very virtue and dignity you should hate the defects of those who live miserably in sin, but not on that account appoint yourselves their judges, which I forbid, because they are My Christs.”¹¹ The Father calls the soul to recognize and hate the defects, but forbids the soul to judge His “Christs,” even as she recognizes their sin. Rather, recognition of these defects, along with personal humility, should encourage a charitable zeal for their conversion, enhanced through recognition of their dignified office. The Father, encouraging her to self-knowledge from the beginning of the dialogue, encourages her in this also to see things as they truly are and to recognize her obligation to charity.
     The Dialogues is a work of deep insight from the communication of a saint and mystic with God. It inspires self-recognition and a recognition of one’s duty to God and neighbor. This timeless work aids one in identifying and embracing fully one’s duty to God and neighbor, motivated by appreciation of God’s love and awareness of the pitiful state of sin.
¹ Robert Kiely, “The saint who lost her head: or who's afraid of Catherine of Siena?” Religion and the Arts 8 no. 3 (2004) 304-305.
² Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, (Grand Rapids, MI: Christian Classics Ethereal Library) 17, at www.ccel.org.
³ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 18.
⁴ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 19-36.
Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 31-36.

⁶ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 39-43.
⁷ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 44-54
⁸ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 55-133.
⁹ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 137-144.
¹⁰ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 144.
¹¹ Catherine of Siena, Dialogue of Catherine of Siena, 151.








No comments:

Post a Comment